🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker may have to permit competitors to operate separate application platforms on Apple devices in the UK, after a ruling from the market watchdog.

This would be a major shift to Apple's well-known "closed system" where applications can only be installed from its own official marketplace.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both Apple and Google as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have a lot of power over smartphone ecosystems.

Regulatory Findings

The regulator said the two companies "may be limiting innovation and market rivalry".

But the authority emphasized it did not "find or assume misconduct" from the firms.

"The app economy contributes 1.5% of the British economy and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these markets function properly for business," stated a top executive from the competition authority.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones run on the two tech companies' mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, nearly half of UK mobile owners use an iPhone - which runs Apple's iOS - with the overwhelming bulk of the rest using Google's Android.

The Company's Response

The regulatory probe focused on how prominent Apple and Google's own applications are versus rivals - as well as their browsers and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the authority will seek to implement, but earlier it published roadmaps outlining potential measures it could take.

These include requiring it to be easier for people to transition between Apple and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

The Cupertino company particularly may be required to allow alternative app stores on its products, and let people to download programs straight from companies' websites.

This would follow comparable regulations in the European Union, which previously imposed measures against Apple for anti-competitive behaviour.

Apple warned the UK could lose access to receiving updates - as has happened in the EU - which the company blames on strict rules.

For example, some Apple Intelligence capabilities which have been rolled out in other parts of the world are not available in the EU.

"We faces intense rivalry in every sector where we operate, and we strive continuously to create the finest offerings, services and customer interface," the organization said in a statement.

"The UK's adoption of EU-style rules would weaken that, resulting in consumers with reduced data protection and security, slower availability to new features, and a divided, less seamless user journey."

Google's Standpoint

Android users can presently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as smooth as Google's own Play Store.

The regulator's plan said Google may have to "modify the interface" of downloading apps straight from websites, as well as "remove user frictions" when using alternative app stores.

"There appears to be no the justification for today's designation decision," a Google competition lead remarked.

The executive said "most" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or install applications directly from a developer's website, and claimed there is a far greater range of applications offered for Google device owners compared to those on iOS products.

"Currently available are 24,000 Android phone models from thirteen hundred phone manufacturers globally, facing intense competition from iOS in the United Kingdom," the representative continued.

Android is an open-source operating system, which means creators can utilize and develop on top of it for free.

The company contends this means it promotes competition.

But advocacy organizations said curbs on these companies' power in different nations "are already helping enterprises to innovate and giving customers more choice".

"The companies' control is now causing real harm by limiting options for users and competition for businesses," stated a consumer advocate.